Elizabeth HOPKINSON, 1686–1730?> (aged 43 years)
- Name
- Elizabeth /HOPKINSON/
Birth
|
|
---|---|
Marriage
|
|
Birth of a son
|
|
Death of a son
|
|
Birth of a daughter
|
|
Birth of a son
|
|
Birth of a son
|
|
Birth of a son
|
|
Birth of a son
|
|
Birth of a daughter
|
|
Birth of a son
|
|
Death of a daughter
|
|
Death of a husband
|
|
Death of a son
|
|
Marriage
|
|
Death of a husband
|
|
Death
|
|
father | |
---|---|
mother | |
Marriage | Marriage — 9 May 1683 — Saundby, Notts |
3 years
herself |
1686–1730
Birth: 3 June 1686
21
22
— Hayton, Notts Death: 19 March 1730 — Hayton, Notts |
|
1684–1736
Birth: 9 September 1684
20
20
— Hayton, Notts Death: 4 February 1736 — Hayton, Notts |
husband |
1682–1722
Birth: 9 June 1682
— Babworth, Notts Death: 25 October 1722 — Hayton, Notts |
---|---|
herself |
1686–1730
Birth: 3 June 1686
21
22
— Hayton, Notts Death: 19 March 1730 — Hayton, Notts |
Marriage | Marriage — 27 September 1703 — Tilne, Hayton, Notts |
12 years
son |
|
2 years
daughter |
1718–1721
Birth: 20 January 1718
35
31
— Hayton, Notts Death: 20 August 1721 — Hayton, Notts |
3 years
son |
1720–1722
Birth: 25 October 1720
38
34
— Hayton, Notts Death: 8 November 1722 — Hayton, Notts |
|
1704–1706
Birth: 2 June 1704
21
17
— Hayton, Notts Death: 11 February 1706 — Hayton, Notts |
22 months
daughter |
|
2 years
son |
|
23 months
son |
|
|
husband | |
---|---|
herself |
1686–1730
Birth: 3 June 1686
21
22
— Hayton, Notts Death: 19 March 1730 — Hayton, Notts |
Marriage | Marriage — 2 December 1723 — Hayton, Notts |
husband | |
---|---|
husband’s partner |
Shared note
|
Born 3 June 1686 in Hayton, so she was 17 when she married Thomas Cuttell in 1703. Here is Catherine's argument (here she is discussing the two Elizabeth Hopkinsons, one the widow who marries Richard Cuttell in 1699, while the other is the spinster aged 18 who marries Thomas Cuttell in 1703): "Maybe her (Elizabeth Hopkinson spinster) marriage to John was unhappy or maybe her children requested it, but it seems to be the most logical idea. Liz spinster was born in Hayton, married and buried two husbands in Hayton, had and buried children in Hayton, yet in 1729 she ups sticks for parts unknown as an aging woman whilst Liz widow, who had no known connection to Hayton other than living in Tiln in 1699 makes the effort to come from parts unknown to die there? I don’t think that is feasible, so I believe that Elizabeth “Cuttel” who died in 1730 is technically Burt, and that she is the spinster Liz Hopkinson, which would make sense if Richard and Liz the widow (who married in 1699) never moved to Hayton or lived there". |
---|