Richard Cuttell, 1720–1722?> (aged 2 years)
- Name
- Richard /Cuttell/
Birth
|
|
---|---|
Death of a sister
|
|
Death of a father
|
|
Death
|
|
father |
1682–1722
Birth: 9 June 1682
— Babworth, Notts Death: 25 October 1722 — Hayton, Notts |
---|---|
mother |
1686–1730
Birth: 3 June 1686
21
22
— Hayton, Notts Death: 19 March 1730 — Hayton, Notts |
Marriage | Marriage — 27 September 1703 — Tilne, Hayton, Notts |
12 years
elder brother |
|
2 years
elder sister |
1718–1721
Birth: 20 January 1718
35
31
— Hayton, Notts Death: 20 August 1721 — Hayton, Notts |
3 years
himself |
1720–1722
Birth: 25 October 1720
38
34
— Hayton, Notts Death: 8 November 1722 — Hayton, Notts |
|
1704–1706
Birth: 2 June 1704
21
17
— Hayton, Notts Death: 11 February 1706 — Hayton, Notts |
22 months
elder sister |
|
2 years
elder brother |
|
23 months
elder brother |
|
|
stepfather | |
---|---|
mother |
1686–1730
Birth: 3 June 1686
21
22
— Hayton, Notts Death: 19 March 1730 — Hayton, Notts |
Marriage | Marriage — 2 December 1723 — Hayton, Notts |
Shared note
|
After much deliberation, now convinced after discussions with Catherine Stewart, that Richard Cuttell died as a two year old in 1722, and that the priest mistakenly wrote the name Thomas instead of Richard. The confusion was caused by Richard's father's death just two weeks earlier, also called Thomas Cuttell (agricola). Supporting evidence is the lack of a death or marriage or any other data on Richard subsequent to this date, together with the lack of a suitable Thomas Cuttell to marry in 1732 to Elizabeth Colton. The only possible Thomas who could have died in 1722 as recorded by the priest was Thomas b1710 in Hayton, and if he died in 1722 then there was no-one to be married in 1732, and start the whole Cuttell dynasty from which we are descended. |
---|